← Cockpit
231_008predictionAIAI-timing

AI discoveries of past errors will topple some Nobel prizes.

Predictor: Peter Diamandis · ep#231 "Top AI News: Sonnet 4.6, Grok 4.2, Gemini 3 Deep Think, and OpenClaw | EP #231" · source

Prior probability
60.0%
Current probability
50.4%
evolves via intake + LBP
Conviction
3/5
Signal quality
C
Resolution
pending
Window
2028-06-01 – 2028-06-30
Edges in / out
8 / 5
Tickers exposed
33

Prediction text

AI discoveries of past errors will topple some Nobel prizes. | it topples some Nobel prizes.

Verbatim quote

From episode "Top AI News: Sonnet 4.6, Grok 4.2, Gemini 3 Deep Think, and OpenClaw | EP #231"
it topples some Nobel prizes.

Predictor: Peter Diamandis

κ + Brier as of 2026-05-22
κ (discount)
0.875
Brier
0.0367
excellent
Hits / Misses
10 / 0
of 15 resolved
Hit rate
66.7%
Calibration plot (stated vs observed)

Evidence about this node from Peter Diamandis is multiplied by κ in /api/intake. Lower κ = less weight; floors at 0.10 (effectively silenced) and caps at 1.00 (full weight).

Reference class

Not linked

This node isn't linked to a reference class. The Bayesian update applies without outside-view blending.

Probability over time

4 prob_history rows
0%25%50%75%100%prior 60%2026-04-302026-05-032026-05-10
intake v2milestone miss sweeplbp propagationreference class assignedlegacy v1prior_prob (analyst seed)current = 50.4%

Milestone chain

Pre-event signals (upstream prereqs + window checkpoints) → resolution event → downstream cascades. Status/dates update from linked nodes; re-derive nightly via scripts/ops/derive_milestones.py.
Leading chain: 5 fired ✓ · 5 pending
  1. 2026-06-01 → 2028-06-30pendingMajor journal (Nature/Science/Cell/NEJM) issues retraction of Nobel-laureate paper attributed to AI-detected error
    How: Public retraction notice in Nature, Science, Cell, NEJM, or PNAS for paper authored by Nobel laureate, with retraction notice or PubPeer thread citing AI-assisted image/data analysis as proximate detection mechanism
    Source: Retraction Watch — Semenza (2019 Nobel) has 17 retractions/concerns; Sudhof (2013) two retractions since 2024; pattern acceleratingconf 65%
    Notes: Detection mechanism attribution is the key — error must be flagged BY AI, not just retracted while AI exists.
  2. 2026-06-01 → 2028-06-30pendingGregg Semenza (2019 Physiology) prize-cited paper retracted or formally challenged
    How: One or more papers cited in Semenza's official Nobel scientific background (HIF-1, oxygen sensing) is retracted, expression-of-concern noted, or formally investigated by Johns Hopkins ORI
    Source: Semenza tally at 17 retractions/concerns 2026; trajectory points at prize-cited work nextconf 45%
    Notes: Semenza is highest-probability single laureate to have prize-cited work challenged.
  3. 2026-09-01 → 2028-06-30pendingAI tool (e.g., ImageTwin, Proofig, Imagetwin) becomes standard pre-publication screening at top-5 journals
    How: Nature, Science, Cell, NEJM, or eLife formally requires AI-image-integrity scan for all submissions per published editorial policy; >=10,000 manuscripts screened with public report
    Source: Existing tools (ImageTwin, Proofig) used selectively; mandatory adoption is leading signal for systematic error discoveryconf 70%
  4. 2026-12-01 → 2028-06-30pendingNobel Foundation issues formal statement on retraction policy or laureate review
    How: Nobel Foundation (nobelprize.org) publishes statement, FAQ, or policy clarification regarding retraction-affected laureates, OR convenes review committee for any laureate's prize-cited work
    Source: Currently Nobel Foundation has no formal mechanism to revoke; policy evolution itself is leading signalconf 30%
  5. 2027-01-01 → 2028-06-30pendingCumulative retraction count for living Nobel laureates exceeds 60 papers (vs ~41 in 2024)
    How: Retraction Watch laureate database tally rises from 41 articles (22 winners, 2024) to >60 articles, with >=15 attributed to AI-assisted detection per metadata or Retraction Watch annotation
    Source: Retraction Watch maintained running tally; AI-assisted share is the diagnosticconf 50%

What if this resolves?

Clamp this prediction TRUE or FALSE and run a counterfactual Gibbs sample. Surfaces the predictions whose marginals shift most under that assumption.
(live posterior: 50%)

Click a button to clamp this prediction and run a Gibbs sample. Returns the predictions whose marginals shift most. ~30s per run; ideal for stress-testing "if X resolves, what else moves?"

Evidence chain

Every probability update with full Bayesian provenance — chronological, latest first
LBP2026-05-10T02:00:02Z50.4%-1.3pp
Network propagation: 51.7% → 50.4%
6-iter LBP, residual 0.00584 · damping 0.5, w_intrinsic 0.5 · method lbp_v3 · run e5c18d29
LBP2026-05-03T02:00:01Z51.7%-1.9pp
Network propagation: 53.6% → 51.7%
6-iter LBP, residual 0.00677 · damping 0.5, w_intrinsic 0.5 · method lbp_v3 · run 1a683ac9
LBP2026-04-30T16:39:51Z53.6%-2.6pp
Network propagation: 56.2% → 53.6%
5-iter LBP, residual 0.00825 · damping 0.5, w_intrinsic 0.5 · method lbp_v2 · run 0c8a4ea3
LBP2026-04-30T02:18:57Z56.2%-3.8pp
Network propagation: 60.0% → 56.2%
5-iter LBP, residual 0.00825 · damping 0.5, w_intrinsic 0.5 · method lbp_v1 · run 592311ef

Network propagation neighbors

Top edges sorted by latest LBP cross-impact
All propagation →

Top incoming (parents)

Edges that influence THIS node's belief

KindNodeTheir probP(c|s=T)P(c|s=F)Δ implied
prereq234_012
Anthropic revenue will cross OpenAI revenue in middle of 202Peter Diamandis
67.1%0.6000.050-0.089
prereqSEM_042
2025 will be the definitive year that agentic systems finallKevin Weil
73.8%0.6000.050-0.054
prereq235_002
Anthropic will exceed OpenAI in revenue this year (2026).Dave Blundin
74.6%0.6000.050-0.049
prereqSEM_012
Nvidia quadrupled chip production output while only doublingJensen Huang
75.0%0.6000.050-0.046
killerTK03
AI Regulatory Moratorium (EU/US Capability Freeze)
10.0%0.0500.600+0.041

Top outgoing (children)

Predictions THIS node influences

KindNodeTheir probP(c|s=T)P(c|s=F)Δ implied
prereq246_017
Europa Clipper will arrive at Jupiter in 2030, conducting 50Peter Diamandis
37.7%0.6500.050-0.030
prereq247_035
Dario Amodei will solve most/all neurological diseases by enDario Amodei
38.8%0.7000.050-0.016
prereqSEM_034
True artificial general intelligence will be achieved betweeDemis Hassabis
28.7%0.5500.050+0.011
prereq246_016
Dragonfly nuclear-powered octicopter arrives at Titan in 203Peter Diamandis
35.6%0.6500.050-0.009
prereq235_030
Ray Kurzweil predicts Longevity Escape Velocity (LEV) by 203Ray Kurzweil
39.2%0.7500.050+0.005

Ticker exposure

33 ticker(s) linked

Beneficiaries (23)

SOUNCRWVSITMNVDAARMGTLBBBAITSMAPLDCEVAAIMSFTMRVLSFTBYORCLQCOMAVGOBABAAMDGOOGLIBMAMZNMETA

Adverse (6)

WNSCHGGCTSHIBMINFYACN

Prerequisites (8)

Predictions that must hit first
TypePredTitleDomainLag
prereq235_002Anthropic will exceed OpenAI in revenue this year (2026).AI
prereqSEM_008Training runs costing $10 billion for a single model will commence sometime in 2025.AI
prereq234_012Anthropic revenue will cross OpenAI revenue in middle of 2026Markets/Stocks
prereqSEM_012Nvidia quadrupled chip production output while only doubling human headcount — achieved by deploying AI coding tools (Cursor, Claude Code) across engineering.AI/Manufacturing
prereqSEM_0422025 will be the definitive year that agentic systems finally hit the mainstream.AI/Agents
killerTK14Superbubble Pop (S&P 500 -40%, Moonshot Capital Evaporates)
killerTK01AGI Capability Plateau (2026-27 Training Stall)
killerTK03AI Regulatory Moratorium (EU/US Capability Freeze)

Dependents (5)

Predictions enabled by this
TypePredTitleDomainLag
prereq235_030Ray Kurzweil predicts Longevity Escape Velocity (LEV) by 2033.Biotech/Longevity
prereq247_035Dario Amodei will solve most/all neurological diseases by end of decadeBiotech/Longevity
prereq246_017Europa Clipper will arrive at Jupiter in 2030, conducting 50 passes near Europa.Space
prereq246_016Dragonfly nuclear-powered octicopter arrives at Titan in 2034.Space
prereqSEM_034True artificial general intelligence will be achieved between 2032 and 2042 — 'first we solve AI, then use AI to solve everything else'.AI/AGI

Linked documents (10)

Auto-generated by cosine similarity from Polymarket / Manifold / EDGAR / GDELT
SimSourceTitleMarket probPolarityReviewedPublished
0.649manifoldWill Michael Levin be awarded the Nobel Prize?32%mentionspending2026-05-27
0.648arxivStop Automating Peer Review Without Rigorous Evaluationmentionspending2026-05-04
0.639manifoldWill any nobel laureate donate their brain to https://bexorg.com/ by eoy2039?30%mentionspending2026-05-28
0.623arxivNegation Neglect: When models fail to learn negations in trainingmentionspending2026-05-13
0.612manifoldWill abhishaike mahajan ever win the nobel prize?28%mentionspending2026-05-04
0.610manifoldWill isaak freeman become a nobel laureate?28%mentionspending2026-05-04
0.594polymarketWill Donald Trump win the Nobel Peace Prize in 2026?11%mentionspending2025-10-15
0.584manifoldDo the recent deaths/disappearances of NASA, nuclear research, & defense-related scientists suggest something sinister?18%mentionspending2026-04-24
0.574arxivRepair Before Veto: Repair-Augmented Constraint Learning for Contextual Decisionsmentionspending2026-06-01
0.551manifoldWill Eliezer Yudkowsky actually debate @47fucb4r8c69323?93%mentionspending2026-04-24

Raw metadata

From Thesis_Timeline_v1.0_FINAL workbook
{
  "nia": false,
  "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HklyjXKYFng",
  "mode": "PREDICTION",
  "role": "Host",
  "context": "I wonder if AI is going to be, you know, aimed at looking at all the scientific literature over the last 100 years and show us where all the mistakes were. I'd count on it. And I think it topples some Nobel prizes.",
  "to_year": 2030,
  "verbatim": "it topples some Nobel prizes.",
  "direction": "HAPPEN",
  "from_year": 2026,
  "timeframe": "future",
  "conv_level": "MEDIUM",
  "milestones": [
    {
      "kind": "prereq",
      "label": "Nvidia quadrupled chip production output while only doubling human headcount — achieved by deploying AI coding tools (Cursor, Claude Code) a",
      "status": "hit",
      "weight": 0.5,
      "ordinal": -10,
      "source_id": "SEM_012",
      "expected_date": "2026-04-29",
      "observed_date": "2026-04-29"
    },
    {
      "kind": "prereq",
      "label": "Training runs costing $10 billion for a single model will commence sometime in 2025.",
      "status": "hit",
      "weight": 0.5,
      "ordinal": -9,
      "source_id": "SEM_008",
      "expected_date": "2026-04-29",
      "observed_date": "2026-04-29"
    },
    {
      "kind": "prereq",
      "label": "Anthropic revenue will cross OpenAI revenue in middle of 2026",
      "status": "hit",
      "weight": 0.5,
      "ordinal": -8,
      "source_id": "234_012",
      "expected_date": "2026-04-29",
      "observed_date": "2026-04-29"
    },
    {
      "kind": "prereq",
      "label": "Anthropic will exceed OpenAI in revenue this year (2026).",
      "status": "hit",
      "weight": 0.5,
      "ordinal": -7,
      "source_id": "235_002",
      "expected_date": "2026-04-29",
      "observed_date": "2026-04-29"
    },
    {
      "kind": "prereq",
      "label": "2025 will be the definitive year that agentic systems finally hit the mainstream.",
      "status": "hit",
      "weight": 0.5,
      "ordinal": -6,
      "source_id": "SEM_042",
      "expected_date": "2026-04-29",
      "observed_date": "2026-04-29"
    },
    {
      "kind": "llm_pre_event",
      "label": "Major journal (Nature/Science/Cell/NEJM) issues retraction of Nobel-laureate paper attributed to AI-detected error",
      "notes": "Detection mechanism attribution is the key — error must be flagged BY AI, not just retracted while AI exists.",
      "source": "Retraction Watch — Semenza (2019 Nobel) has 17 retractions/concerns; Sudhof (2013) two retractions since 2024; pattern accelerating",
      "status": "pending",
      "weight": 0.4,
      "ordinal": -5,
      "source_id": null,
      "confidence": 0.65,
      "source_url": "https://retractionwatch.com/retractions-by-nobel-prize-winners/",
      "expected_date": "2027-06-16",
      "research_origin": "deep_research",
      "expected_date_range": {
        "to": "2028-06-30",
        "from": "2026-06-01"
      },
      "measurement_criterion": "Public retraction notice in Nature, Science, Cell, NEJM, or PNAS for paper authored by Nobel laureate, with retraction notice or PubPeer thread citing AI-assisted image/data analysis as proximate detection mechanism"
    },
    {
      "kind": "llm_pre_event",
      "label": "Gregg Semenza (2019 Physiology) prize-cited paper retracted or formally challenged",
      "notes": "Semenza is highest-probability single laureate to have prize-cited work challenged.",
      "source": "Semenza tally at 17 retractions/concerns 2026; trajectory points at prize-cited work next",
      "status": "pending",
      "weight": 0.4,
      "ordinal": -4,
      "source_id": null,
      "confidence": 0.45,
      "source_url": "https://retractionwatch.com/2023/10/02/nobel-prize-winner-gregg-semenza-tallies-tenth-retraction/",
      "expected_date": "2027-06-16",
      "research_origin": "deep_research",
      "expected_date_range": {
        "to": "2028-06-30",
        "from": "2026-06-01"
      },
      "measurement_criterion": "One or more papers cited in Semenza's offi
... (truncated)