Broad civilizational cyber attack via AI hash function inversion is borderline guaranteed.
Predictor: Alex Wissner-Gross · ep#246 "SpaceX Goes Public, Claude's Mythos Release, and the US Data Center Delay | EP #246" · source
Prediction text
Broad civilizational cyber attack via AI hash function inversion is borderline guaranteed. | I would say it's borderline guaranteed that there will be some sort of cyber attack attempt at a broad scale if for no other reason than that the the target of such a broad cyber attack is an incredibly tempting benchmark for benchmarking the improvement of reasoning capabilities.
Verbatim quote
I would say it's borderline guaranteed that there will be some sort of cyber attack attempt at a broad scale if for no other reason than that the the target of such a broad cyber attack is an incredibly tempting benchmark for benchmarking the improvement of reasoning capabilities.
Predictor: Alex Wissner-Gross
Calibration plot (stated vs observed)
Evidence about this node from Alex Wissner-Gross is multiplied by κ in /api/intake. Lower κ = less weight; floors at 0.10 (effectively silenced) and caps at 1.00 (full weight).
Reference class
This node isn't linked to a reference class. The Bayesian update applies without outside-view blending.
Probability over time
Milestone chain
- 2026-06-01 → 2029-12-31pendingAgentic AI red-team frameworks demonstrate end-to-end exploit chain (reconnaissance through payload deployment) without human intervention in published benchmarksHow: Major AI safety lab (METR, Apollo, RAND, NIST AISI) or academic group publishes evaluation showing frontier model autonomously completes multi-stage cyber kill chain in sandboxed real-world-equivalent environmentSource: METR / NIST AISI evaluations; academic publicationsconf 70%
- 2026-01-01 → 2030-12-31pendingEU/US post-quantum migration mandates accelerate driven by AI-cryptanalysis fears (in addition to quantum 'harvest-now-decrypt-later' threats)How: At least 1 EU or US regulator (ENISA, CISA, NIST, ANSSI, BSI) publishes guidance or rule explicitly citing AI-assisted cryptanalysis (alongside quantum) as motivating PQC migration timelinesSource: ENISA/CISA/NIST advisory publicationsconf 60%
- 2026-06-01 → 2030-12-31pendingDocumented AI-enabled cyber attack on critical infrastructure (power grid, water, transportation, finance) with autonomous reconnaissance + exploit chain attributed by CISA / ENISA / MITREHow: CISA, ENISA, NSA, or major SOC firm (Mandiant, CrowdStrike) publishes incident report attributing successful attack on US/EU critical infrastructure to autonomous/agentic AI tooling for reconnaissance, vuln discovery, or exploit generationSource: CISA Advisories; ENISA Threat Landscape; Mandiant M-Trendsconf 70%
- 2028-11-18pendingQ1 window check-in (25%)
- 2027-01-01 → 2032-12-31pendingCascade: insurance market repricing (cyber insurance premiums, exclusions for AI-enabled attacks) signals industry validation of threatHow: Major cyber insurers (Beazley, AIG, Chubb, Lloyd's syndicates) publicly cite AI-enabled attack vectors in rate filings or coverage exclusions, with measurable premium increases tied to AI threatSource: Lloyd's Market Bulletin; insurer rate filingsconf 50%
- 2027-01-01 → 2034-12-31pendingFrontier AI model demonstrates partial cryptanalysis capability (preimage / collision attacks against weakened or reduced-round hash functions) in published researchHow: Peer-reviewed publication (CRYPTO, EUROCRYPT, USENIX Security, IEEE S&P) demonstrates AI-assisted attack against reduced-round SHA-2/3 or production hash function with measurable speedup over classical methodsSource: IACR ePrint; USENIX/CRYPTO conference proceedingsconf 40%
- 2031-06-10pendingQ2 window check-in (50%)
- 2033-12-30pendingQ3 window check-in (75%)
No downstream cascades — this prediction is a leaf in the dependency graph.
What if this resolves?
Click a button to clamp this prediction and run a Gibbs sample. Returns the predictions whose marginals shift most. ~30s per run; ideal for stress-testing "if X resolves, what else moves?"
Evidence chain
Network propagation neighbors
Top incoming (parents)
Edges that influence THIS node's belief
| Kind | Node | Their prob | P(c|s=T) | P(c|s=F) | Δ implied |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| prereq | S_ASI_SLOW_2040PLUS ASI slow: post-2040 / soft takeoff | 60.0% | 0.500 | 0.050 | -0.095 |
| killer | TK03 AI Regulatory Moratorium (EU/US Capability Freeze) | 10.0% | 0.050 | 0.500 | +0.040 |
| killer | TK01 AGI Capability Plateau (2026-27 Training Stall) | 15.0% | 0.050 | 0.500 | +0.017 |
| killer | TK14 Superbubble Pop (S&P 500 -40%, Moonshot Capital Evaporates) | 20.0% | 0.050 | 0.500 | -0.005 |
Top outgoing (children)
Predictions THIS node influences
No outgoing edges.
Ticker exposure
Beneficiaries (23)
Adverse (6)
Prerequisites (4)
| Type | Pred | Title | Domain | Lag |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| prereq | S_ASI_SLOW_2040PLUS | ASI slow: post-2040 / soft takeoff | asi_recursive_self_improvement | — |
| killer | TK14 | Superbubble Pop (S&P 500 -40%, Moonshot Capital Evaporates) | — | — |
| killer | TK01 | AGI Capability Plateau (2026-27 Training Stall) | — | — |
| killer | TK03 | AI Regulatory Moratorium (EU/US Capability Freeze) | — | — |
Dependents (0)
| Type | Pred | Title | Domain | Lag |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No dependents | ||||
Linked documents (10)
Raw metadata
{
"nia": false,
"url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cFI-SqnvQK8",
"mode": "PREDICTION",
"role": "Host",
"context": "I would say it's borderline guaranteed that there will be some sort of cyber attack attempt at a broad scale",
"verbatim": "I would say it's borderline guaranteed that there will be some sort of cyber attack attempt at a broad scale if for no other reason than that the the target of such a broad cyber attack is an incredibly tempting benchmark for benchmarking the improvement of reasoning capabilities.",
"conv_cues": "borderline guaranteed",
"direction": "HAPPEN",
"timeframe": "Indeterminate (near future)",
"conv_level": "HIGH",
"milestones": [
{
"kind": "llm_pre_event",
"label": "Agentic AI red-team frameworks demonstrate end-to-end exploit chain (reconnaissance through payload deployment) without human intervention in published benchmarks",
"source": "METR / NIST AISI evaluations; academic publications",
"status": "pending",
"weight": 0.4,
"ordinal": -8,
"source_id": null,
"confidence": 0.7,
"expected_date": "2028-03-16",
"research_origin": "training",
"expected_date_range": {
"to": "2029-12-31",
"from": "2026-06-01"
},
"measurement_criterion": "Major AI safety lab (METR, Apollo, RAND, NIST AISI) or academic group publishes evaluation showing frontier model autonomously completes multi-stage cyber kill chain in sandboxed real-world-equivalent environment"
},
{
"kind": "llm_pre_event",
"label": "EU/US post-quantum migration mandates accelerate driven by AI-cryptanalysis fears (in addition to quantum 'harvest-now-decrypt-later' threats)",
"source": "ENISA/CISA/NIST advisory publications",
"status": "pending",
"weight": 0.4,
"ordinal": -7,
"source_id": null,
"confidence": 0.6,
"expected_date": "2028-07-01",
"research_origin": "training",
"expected_date_range": {
"to": "2030-12-31",
"from": "2026-01-01"
},
"measurement_criterion": "At least 1 EU or US regulator (ENISA, CISA, NIST, ANSSI, BSI) publishes guidance or rule explicitly citing AI-assisted cryptanalysis (alongside quantum) as motivating PQC migration timelines"
},
{
"kind": "llm_pre_event",
"label": "Documented AI-enabled cyber attack on critical infrastructure (power grid, water, transportation, finance) with autonomous reconnaissance + exploit chain attributed by CISA / ENISA / MITRE",
"source": "CISA Advisories; ENISA Threat Landscape; Mandiant M-Trends",
"status": "pending",
"weight": 0.4,
"ordinal": -6,
"source_id": null,
"confidence": 0.7,
"expected_date": "2028-09-15",
"research_origin": "training",
"expected_date_range": {
"to": "2030-12-31",
"from": "2026-06-01"
},
"measurement_criterion": "CISA, ENISA, NSA, or major SOC firm (Mandiant, CrowdStrike) publishes incident report attributing successful attack on US/EU critical infrastructure to autonomous/agentic AI tooling for reconnaissance, vuln discovery, or exploit generation"
},
{
"kind": "quartile_checkpoint",
"label": "Q1 window check-in (25%)",
"status": "pending",
"weight": 0.05,
"ordinal": -5,
"source_id": null,
"expected_date": "2028-11-18",
"observed_date": null
},
{
"kind": "llm_post_event",
"label": "Cascade: insurance market repricing (cyber insurance premiums, exclusions for AI-enabled attacks) signals industry validation of threat",
"source": "Lloyd's Market Bulletin; insurer rate filings",
"status": "pending",
"weight": 0.4,
"ordinal": -4,
"source_id": null,
"confidence": 0.5,
"expected_date": "2029-12-31",
"research_origin": "training",
"expected_date_range": {
"to": "2032-12-31",
"from": "2027-01-01"
},
"
... (truncated)