← Cockpit
246_028predictionAIAI-timing

Broad civilizational cyber attack via AI hash function inversion is borderline guaranteed.

Predictor: Alex Wissner-Gross · ep#246 "SpaceX Goes Public, Claude's Mythos Release, and the US Data Center Delay | EP #246" · source

Prior probability
50.0%
Current probability
41.5%
evolves via intake + LBP
Conviction
4/5
Signal quality
B
Resolution
pending
Window
2026-04-30 – 2040-10-31
Edges in / out
4 / 0
Tickers exposed
33

Prediction text

Broad civilizational cyber attack via AI hash function inversion is borderline guaranteed. | I would say it's borderline guaranteed that there will be some sort of cyber attack attempt at a broad scale if for no other reason than that the the target of such a broad cyber attack is an incredibly tempting benchmark for benchmarking the improvement of reasoning capabilities.

Verbatim quote

From episode "SpaceX Goes Public, Claude's Mythos Release, and the US Data Center Delay | EP #246"
I would say it's borderline guaranteed that there will be some sort of cyber attack attempt at a broad scale if for no other reason than that the the target of such a broad cyber attack is an incredibly tempting benchmark for benchmarking the improvement of reasoning capabilities.

Predictor: Alex Wissner-Gross

κ + Brier as of 2026-05-22
κ (discount)
0.844
Brier
0.0341
excellent
Hits / Misses
6 / 1
of 11 resolved
Hit rate
54.5%
Calibration plot (stated vs observed)

Evidence about this node from Alex Wissner-Gross is multiplied by κ in /api/intake. Lower κ = less weight; floors at 0.10 (effectively silenced) and caps at 1.00 (full weight).

Reference class

Not linked

This node isn't linked to a reference class. The Bayesian update applies without outside-view blending.

Probability over time

4 prob_history rows
0%25%50%75%100%prior 50%2026-04-302026-05-032026-05-10
intake v2milestone miss sweeplbp propagationreference class assignedlegacy v1prior_prob (analyst seed)current = 41.5%

Milestone chain

Pre-event signals (upstream prereqs + window checkpoints) → resolution event → downstream cascades. Status/dates update from linked nodes; re-derive nightly via scripts/ops/derive_milestones.py.
Leading chain: 8 pending
  1. 2026-06-01 → 2029-12-31pendingAgentic AI red-team frameworks demonstrate end-to-end exploit chain (reconnaissance through payload deployment) without human intervention in published benchmarks
    How: Major AI safety lab (METR, Apollo, RAND, NIST AISI) or academic group publishes evaluation showing frontier model autonomously completes multi-stage cyber kill chain in sandboxed real-world-equivalent environment
    Source: METR / NIST AISI evaluations; academic publicationsconf 70%
  2. 2026-01-01 → 2030-12-31pendingEU/US post-quantum migration mandates accelerate driven by AI-cryptanalysis fears (in addition to quantum 'harvest-now-decrypt-later' threats)
    How: At least 1 EU or US regulator (ENISA, CISA, NIST, ANSSI, BSI) publishes guidance or rule explicitly citing AI-assisted cryptanalysis (alongside quantum) as motivating PQC migration timelines
    Source: ENISA/CISA/NIST advisory publicationsconf 60%
  3. 2026-06-01 → 2030-12-31pendingDocumented AI-enabled cyber attack on critical infrastructure (power grid, water, transportation, finance) with autonomous reconnaissance + exploit chain attributed by CISA / ENISA / MITRE
    How: CISA, ENISA, NSA, or major SOC firm (Mandiant, CrowdStrike) publishes incident report attributing successful attack on US/EU critical infrastructure to autonomous/agentic AI tooling for reconnaissance, vuln discovery, or exploit generation
    Source: CISA Advisories; ENISA Threat Landscape; Mandiant M-Trendsconf 70%
  4. 2028-11-18pendingQ1 window check-in (25%)
  5. 2027-01-01 → 2032-12-31pendingCascade: insurance market repricing (cyber insurance premiums, exclusions for AI-enabled attacks) signals industry validation of threat
    How: Major cyber insurers (Beazley, AIG, Chubb, Lloyd's syndicates) publicly cite AI-enabled attack vectors in rate filings or coverage exclusions, with measurable premium increases tied to AI threat
    Source: Lloyd's Market Bulletin; insurer rate filingsconf 50%
  6. 2027-01-01 → 2034-12-31pendingFrontier AI model demonstrates partial cryptanalysis capability (preimage / collision attacks against weakened or reduced-round hash functions) in published research
    How: Peer-reviewed publication (CRYPTO, EUROCRYPT, USENIX Security, IEEE S&P) demonstrates AI-assisted attack against reduced-round SHA-2/3 or production hash function with measurable speedup over classical methods
    Source: IACR ePrint; USENIX/CRYPTO conference proceedingsconf 40%
  7. 2031-06-10pendingQ2 window check-in (50%)
  8. 2033-12-30pendingQ3 window check-in (75%)

No downstream cascades — this prediction is a leaf in the dependency graph.

What if this resolves?

Clamp this prediction TRUE or FALSE and run a counterfactual Gibbs sample. Surfaces the predictions whose marginals shift most under that assumption.
(live posterior: 42%)

Click a button to clamp this prediction and run a Gibbs sample. Returns the predictions whose marginals shift most. ~30s per run; ideal for stress-testing "if X resolves, what else moves?"

Evidence chain

Every probability update with full Bayesian provenance — chronological, latest first
LBP2026-05-10T02:00:02Z41.5%-1.2pp
Network propagation: 42.7% → 41.5%
6-iter LBP, residual 0.00584 · damping 0.5, w_intrinsic 0.5 · method lbp_v3 · run e5c18d29
LBP2026-05-03T02:00:01Z42.7%-2.3pp
Network propagation: 45.0% → 42.7%
6-iter LBP, residual 0.00677 · damping 0.5, w_intrinsic 0.5 · method lbp_v3 · run 1a683ac9
LBP2026-04-30T16:39:51Z45.0%-1.7pp
Network propagation: 46.7% → 45.0%
5-iter LBP, residual 0.00825 · damping 0.5, w_intrinsic 0.5 · method lbp_v2 · run 0c8a4ea3
LBP2026-04-30T02:18:57Z46.7%-3.3pp
Network propagation: 50.0% → 46.7%
5-iter LBP, residual 0.00825 · damping 0.5, w_intrinsic 0.5 · method lbp_v1 · run 592311ef

Network propagation neighbors

Top edges sorted by latest LBP cross-impact
All propagation →

Top incoming (parents)

Edges that influence THIS node's belief

KindNodeTheir probP(c|s=T)P(c|s=F)Δ implied
prereqS_ASI_SLOW_2040PLUS
ASI slow: post-2040 / soft takeoff
60.0%0.5000.050-0.095
killerTK03
AI Regulatory Moratorium (EU/US Capability Freeze)
10.0%0.0500.500+0.040
killerTK01
AGI Capability Plateau (2026-27 Training Stall)
15.0%0.0500.500+0.017
killerTK14
Superbubble Pop (S&P 500 -40%, Moonshot Capital Evaporates)
20.0%0.0500.500-0.005

Top outgoing (children)

Predictions THIS node influences

No outgoing edges.

Ticker exposure

33 ticker(s) linked

Beneficiaries (23)

SOUNCRWVSITMNVDAARMGTLBBBAITSMAPLDCEVAAIMSFTMRVLSFTBYORCLQCOMAVGOBABAAMDGOOGLIBMAMZNMETA

Adverse (6)

WNSCHGGCTSHIBMINFYACN

Prerequisites (4)

Predictions that must hit first
TypePredTitleDomainLag
prereqS_ASI_SLOW_2040PLUSASI slow: post-2040 / soft takeoffasi_recursive_self_improvement
killerTK14Superbubble Pop (S&P 500 -40%, Moonshot Capital Evaporates)
killerTK01AGI Capability Plateau (2026-27 Training Stall)
killerTK03AI Regulatory Moratorium (EU/US Capability Freeze)

Dependents (0)

Predictions enabled by this
TypePredTitleDomainLag
No dependents

Linked documents (10)

Auto-generated by cosine similarity from Polymarket / Manifold / EDGAR / GDELT

Raw metadata

From Thesis_Timeline_v1.0_FINAL workbook
{
  "nia": false,
  "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cFI-SqnvQK8",
  "mode": "PREDICTION",
  "role": "Host",
  "context": "I would say it's borderline guaranteed that there will be some sort of cyber attack attempt at a broad scale",
  "verbatim": "I would say it's borderline guaranteed that there will be some sort of cyber attack attempt at a broad scale if for no other reason than that the the target of such a broad cyber attack is an incredibly tempting benchmark for benchmarking the improvement of reasoning capabilities.",
  "conv_cues": "borderline guaranteed",
  "direction": "HAPPEN",
  "timeframe": "Indeterminate (near future)",
  "conv_level": "HIGH",
  "milestones": [
    {
      "kind": "llm_pre_event",
      "label": "Agentic AI red-team frameworks demonstrate end-to-end exploit chain (reconnaissance through payload deployment) without human intervention in published benchmarks",
      "source": "METR / NIST AISI evaluations; academic publications",
      "status": "pending",
      "weight": 0.4,
      "ordinal": -8,
      "source_id": null,
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "expected_date": "2028-03-16",
      "research_origin": "training",
      "expected_date_range": {
        "to": "2029-12-31",
        "from": "2026-06-01"
      },
      "measurement_criterion": "Major AI safety lab (METR, Apollo, RAND, NIST AISI) or academic group publishes evaluation showing frontier model autonomously completes multi-stage cyber kill chain in sandboxed real-world-equivalent environment"
    },
    {
      "kind": "llm_pre_event",
      "label": "EU/US post-quantum migration mandates accelerate driven by AI-cryptanalysis fears (in addition to quantum 'harvest-now-decrypt-later' threats)",
      "source": "ENISA/CISA/NIST advisory publications",
      "status": "pending",
      "weight": 0.4,
      "ordinal": -7,
      "source_id": null,
      "confidence": 0.6,
      "expected_date": "2028-07-01",
      "research_origin": "training",
      "expected_date_range": {
        "to": "2030-12-31",
        "from": "2026-01-01"
      },
      "measurement_criterion": "At least 1 EU or US regulator (ENISA, CISA, NIST, ANSSI, BSI) publishes guidance or rule explicitly citing AI-assisted cryptanalysis (alongside quantum) as motivating PQC migration timelines"
    },
    {
      "kind": "llm_pre_event",
      "label": "Documented AI-enabled cyber attack on critical infrastructure (power grid, water, transportation, finance) with autonomous reconnaissance + exploit chain attributed by CISA / ENISA / MITRE",
      "source": "CISA Advisories; ENISA Threat Landscape; Mandiant M-Trends",
      "status": "pending",
      "weight": 0.4,
      "ordinal": -6,
      "source_id": null,
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "expected_date": "2028-09-15",
      "research_origin": "training",
      "expected_date_range": {
        "to": "2030-12-31",
        "from": "2026-06-01"
      },
      "measurement_criterion": "CISA, ENISA, NSA, or major SOC firm (Mandiant, CrowdStrike) publishes incident report attributing successful attack on US/EU critical infrastructure to autonomous/agentic AI tooling for reconnaissance, vuln discovery, or exploit generation"
    },
    {
      "kind": "quartile_checkpoint",
      "label": "Q1 window check-in (25%)",
      "status": "pending",
      "weight": 0.05,
      "ordinal": -5,
      "source_id": null,
      "expected_date": "2028-11-18",
      "observed_date": null
    },
    {
      "kind": "llm_post_event",
      "label": "Cascade: insurance market repricing (cyber insurance premiums, exclusions for AI-enabled attacks) signals industry validation of threat",
      "source": "Lloyd's Market Bulletin; insurer rate filings",
      "status": "pending",
      "weight": 0.4,
      "ordinal": -4,
      "source_id": null,
      "confidence": 0.5,
      "expected_date": "2029-12-31",
      "research_origin": "training",
      "expected_date_range": {
        "to": "2032-12-31",
        "from": "2027-01-01"
      },
      "
... (truncated)