← Cockpit
AI_008predictionAIsuperintelligence-2030

Once 2027 AGI arrives (AI researchers capable of autonomous research), the intelligence explosion begins — compressing roughly a decade of human-led algorithmic progress into a single year and culminating in Superintelligence by 2030.

Predictor: Leopold Aschenbrenner

Prior probability
28.0%
Current probability
29.2%
evolves via intake + LBP
Conviction
5/5
Signal quality
A
Resolution
pending
Window
2027-01-01 – 2030-11-30
Edges in / out
8 / 0
Tickers exposed
4

Prediction text

Once 2027 AGI arrives (AI researchers capable of autonomous research), the intelligence explosion begins — compressing roughly a decade of human-led algorithmic progress into a single year and culminating in Superintelligence by 2030. | First public recursive-self-improvement demonstration

Key catalyst: First public recursive-self-improvement demonstration

Watch events: Frontier lab disclosure of recursive-self-improvement capability; automated ML research benchmarks

Resolution evidence

Status: pending

Aschenbrenner Situational Awareness framework (2024) continues driving hyperscaler capex and national-security planning; recursive-self-improvement empirical onset is the binary test.

Predictor: Leopold Aschenbrenner

κ + Brier as of 2026-05-22
κ (discount)
0.688
Brier
0.0417
excellent
Hits / Misses
2 / 0
of 3 resolved
Hit rate
66.7%
Calibration plot (stated vs observed)

Evidence about this node from Leopold Aschenbrenner is multiplied by κ in /api/intake. Lower κ = less weight; floors at 0.10 (effectively silenced) and caps at 1.00 (full weight).

Reference class: agi_breakthrough_5y

Linked via embedding similarity 0.608

Major capability discontinuity (e.g. AGI by named target year, 5-year horizon)

Base rate
20.0%
1/5 historical
Inside weight
Outside weight
no pull
inside 29.2% → blend 29.2% 0.0pp)

Tetlock-style outside view: at TRF=1 (just predicted), outside view dominates (w_in=0.3). At TRF=0 (deadline), inside view dominates (w_in=1.0). The blend regularizes overconfident inside views toward the historical base rate.

Probability over time

6 prob_history rows
0%25%50%75%100%prior 28%2026-04-302026-04-302026-05-10
intake v2milestone miss sweeplbp propagationreference class assignedlegacy v1prior_prob (analyst seed)current = 29.2%

Milestone chain

Pre-event signals (upstream prereqs + window checkpoints) → resolution event → downstream cascades. Status/dates update from linked nodes; re-derive nightly via scripts/ops/derive_milestones.py.
Leading chain: 8 pending
  1. 2027-04-30pendingStanford AI Index 2027 documents recursive self-improvement evidence in deployed systems
    How: Stanford HAI's annual AI Index includes a chapter specifically documenting RSI behaviors in deployed agents, citing >=3 named systems
    Source: Stanford AI Index 2026 Technical Performanceconf 65%
  2. 2027-09-17pendingQ1 window check-in (25%)
  3. 2027-01-01 → 2028-06-30pendingICLR / NeurIPS RSI workshop cohort produces published 'AI researcher' agent that authors a top-tier ML paper
    How: Peer-reviewed ML paper (NeurIPS/ICLR/ICML) where the primary research/coding contributor is an autonomous agent, validated by program committee
    Source: ICLR 2026 Workshop on AI with Recursive Self-Improvementconf 60%
  4. 2027-06-01 → 2028-12-31pendingFirst public recursive-self-improvement demonstration on safety-critical benchmark
    How: METR or equivalent independent evaluator publishes report showing measurable capability gains from agent's autonomous self-modification with reproducible methodology
    Source: METR research program; HyperAgents reference (March 2026)conf 60%
  5. 2028-06-03pendingQ2 window check-in (50%)
  6. 2027-06-01 → 2029-06-30pendingFrontier-lab model card discloses substantive role of automated AI research in capability gain
    How: OpenAI / Anthropic / DeepMind model card or system card explicitly attributes >=20% of capability improvement to AI-driven research/algorithmic discovery
    Source: Aschenbrenner Situational Awareness — intelligence explosion thesisconf 50%
  7. 2029-02-18pendingQ3 window check-in (75%)
  8. 2029-03-31pendingScenario fires: AGI mid: Kurzweil 2029 path
  9. 2029-01-01 → 2030-11-30pendingCascade: superintelligence-tier capability claim by frontier lab
    How: A major frontier lab (OpenAI/Anthropic/Google DeepMind/xAI) publicly declares achievement of system that exceeds human expert performance across all measurable cognitive domains
    Source: Cascade reasoning from prediction textconf 40%

What if this resolves?

Clamp this prediction TRUE or FALSE and run a counterfactual Gibbs sample. Surfaces the predictions whose marginals shift most under that assumption.
(live posterior: 29%)

Click a button to clamp this prediction and run a Gibbs sample. Returns the predictions whose marginals shift most. ~30s per run; ideal for stress-testing "if X resolves, what else moves?"

Evidence chain

Every probability update with full Bayesian provenance — chronological, latest first
LBP2026-05-10T02:00:02Z29.2%+1.9pp
Network propagation: 27.3% → 29.2%
6-iter LBP, residual 0.00584 · damping 0.5, w_intrinsic 0.5 · method lbp_v3 · run e5c18d29
LBP2026-05-03T02:00:01Z27.3%+3.5pp
Network propagation: 23.8% → 27.3%
6-iter LBP, residual 0.00677 · damping 0.5, w_intrinsic 0.5 · method lbp_v3 · run 1a683ac9
LBP2026-04-30T16:39:51Z23.8%+1.6pp
Network propagation: 22.2% → 23.8%
5-iter LBP, residual 0.00825 · damping 0.5, w_intrinsic 0.5 · method lbp_v2 · run 0c8a4ea3
legacy v12026-04-30T16:13:50Z22.2%-1.6pp
reference_class_assigned bayesian_v2 inside=0.280 blend=0.222 w_in=0.30 agi_breakthrough_5y
LBP2026-04-30T02:18:57Z23.8%+1.6pp
Network propagation: 22.2% → 23.8%
5-iter LBP, residual 0.00825 · damping 0.5, w_intrinsic 0.5 · method lbp_v1 · run 592311ef
legacy v12026-04-30T01:56:50Z22.2%-5.8pp
reference_class_assigned bayesian_v2 inside=0.280 blend=0.222 w_in=0.30 agi_breakthrough_5y

Network propagation neighbors

Top edges sorted by latest LBP cross-impact
All propagation →

Top incoming (parents)

Edges that influence THIS node's belief

KindNodeTheir probP(c|s=T)P(c|s=F)Δ implied
killerTK01
AGI Capability Plateau (2026-27 Training Stall)
15.0%0.0500.280-0.047
killerTK03
AI Regulatory Moratorium (EU/US Capability Freeze)
10.0%0.0500.280-0.035
killerTK11
Autonomous Regulatory Block (Level 4 Halt)
10.0%0.0500.280-0.035
killerTK06
China-Taiwan Military Conflict
8.0%0.0500.280-0.031

Top outgoing (children)

Predictions THIS node influences

No outgoing edges.

Ticker exposure

4 ticker(s) linked

Adverse (4)

ALLPGRTRVUBER

Prerequisites (8)

Predictions that must hit first
TypePredTitleDomainLag
correlateS_ASI_SLOW_2040PLUSASI slow: post-2040 / soft takeoffasi_recursive_self_improvement
correlateS_AGI_MID_2029AGI mid: Kurzweil 2029 pathagi_general_capability
correlateS_AGI_SLOW_2031AGI slow: Schmidt/Hassabis 5-10 year pathagi_general_capability
correlateS_AGI_WINTER_2036PLUSAGI delayed: capability plateau or AI winteragi_general_capability
killerTK01AGI Capability Plateau (2026-27 Training Stall)
killerTK03AI Regulatory Moratorium (EU/US Capability Freeze)
killerTK11Autonomous Regulatory Block (Level 4 Halt)
killerTK06China-Taiwan Military Conflict

Dependents (0)

Predictions enabled by this
TypePredTitleDomainLag
No dependents

Linked documents (2)

Auto-generated by cosine similarity from Polymarket / Manifold / EDGAR / GDELT
SimSourceTitleMarket probPolarityReviewedPublished
0.688manifoldWill an AI system discover information theory from first principles before 2031?35%mentionspending2026-05-01
0.578gdelt2026042918071534687mentionspending2026-04-30

Raw metadata

From Thesis_Timeline_v1.0_FINAL workbook
{
  "nia": false,
  "qty": "10-year compression to 1 year",
  "mode": "FORECAST",
  "role": "Cited-VC/Researcher",
  "context": "Extends SEM_002 (AGI 2025-2026) and INF_001 (AGI 2027) into the specific ASI-2030 endpoint with explicit decade-in-a-year compression mechanism. Most mathematically rigorous short-timeline framework.",
  "to_year": 2030,
  "conv_cues": "OOMs mathematical framework; explicit year; specific compression ratio",
  "direction": "HAPPEN",
  "from_year": 2027,
  "timeframe": "2027-2030",
  "conv_level": "HIGH",
  "milestones": [
    {
      "kind": "llm_pre_event",
      "label": "Stanford AI Index 2027 documents recursive self-improvement evidence in deployed systems",
      "source": "Stanford AI Index 2026 Technical Performance",
      "status": "pending",
      "weight": 0.4,
      "ordinal": -8,
      "source_id": null,
      "confidence": 0.65,
      "source_url": "https://hai.stanford.edu/ai-index/2026-ai-index-report/technical-performance",
      "expected_date": "2027-04-30",
      "research_origin": "deep_research",
      "measurement_criterion": "Stanford HAI's annual AI Index includes a chapter specifically documenting RSI behaviors in deployed agents, citing >=3 named systems"
    },
    {
      "kind": "quartile_checkpoint",
      "label": "Q1 window check-in (25%)",
      "status": "pending",
      "weight": 0.05,
      "ordinal": -7,
      "source_id": null,
      "expected_date": "2027-09-17",
      "observed_date": null
    },
    {
      "kind": "llm_pre_event",
      "label": "ICLR / NeurIPS RSI workshop cohort produces published 'AI researcher' agent that authors a top-tier ML paper",
      "source": "ICLR 2026 Workshop on AI with Recursive Self-Improvement",
      "status": "pending",
      "weight": 0.4,
      "ordinal": -6,
      "source_id": null,
      "confidence": 0.6,
      "source_url": "https://recursive-workshop.github.io/",
      "expected_date": "2027-10-01",
      "research_origin": "deep_research",
      "expected_date_range": {
        "to": "2028-06-30",
        "from": "2027-01-01"
      },
      "measurement_criterion": "Peer-reviewed ML paper (NeurIPS/ICLR/ICML) where the primary research/coding contributor is an autonomous agent, validated by program committee"
    },
    {
      "kind": "llm_pre_event",
      "label": "First public recursive-self-improvement demonstration on safety-critical benchmark",
      "source": "METR research program; HyperAgents reference (March 2026)",
      "status": "pending",
      "weight": 0.4,
      "ordinal": -5,
      "source_id": null,
      "confidence": 0.6,
      "source_url": "https://metr.org/",
      "expected_date": "2028-03-16",
      "research_origin": "deep_research",
      "expected_date_range": {
        "to": "2028-12-31",
        "from": "2027-06-01"
      },
      "measurement_criterion": "METR or equivalent independent evaluator publishes report showing measurable capability gains from agent's autonomous self-modification with reproducible methodology"
    },
    {
      "kind": "quartile_checkpoint",
      "label": "Q2 window check-in (50%)",
      "status": "pending",
      "weight": 0.05,
      "ordinal": -4,
      "source_id": null,
      "expected_date": "2028-06-03",
      "observed_date": null
    },
    {
      "kind": "llm_pre_event",
      "label": "Frontier-lab model card discloses substantive role of automated AI research in capability gain",
      "source": "Aschenbrenner Situational Awareness — intelligence explosion thesis",
      "status": "pending",
      "weight": 0.4,
      "ordinal": -3,
      "source_id": null,
      "confidence": 0.5,
      "expected_date": "2028-06-15",
      "research_origin": "deep_research",
      "expected_date_range": {
        "to": "2029-06-30",
        "from": "2027-06-01"
      },
      "measurement_criterion": "OpenAI / Anthropic / DeepMind model card or system card explicitly attributes >=20% of capability improvement to AI-driven research/algorithmic discovery"
  
... (truncated)