Post-AGI (2027+), a decade of human-led algorithmic progress will be compressed into ~1 year or less as AGIs automate AI research.
Predictor: Leopold Aschenbrenner
Prediction text
Post-AGI (2027+), a decade of human-led algorithmic progress will be compressed into ~1 year or less as AGIs automate AI research. | Post-AGI capability jump rate
Key catalyst: Post-AGI capability jump rate
Watch events: AI-automated ML research outputs; published-paper authorship tracking; frontier model capability jump rates.
Resolution evidence
Recursive self-improvement (Wissner-Gross SEM-adj call: 'already here, not 10 years out') showing early signs via AlphaEvolve; magnitude uncertain.
Predictor: Leopold Aschenbrenner
Calibration plot (stated vs observed)
Evidence about this node from Leopold Aschenbrenner is multiplied by κ in /api/intake. Lower κ = less weight; floors at 0.10 (effectively silenced) and caps at 1.00 (full weight).
Reference class: agi_breakthrough_5y
Major capability discontinuity (e.g. AGI by named target year, 5-year horizon)
Tetlock-style outside view: at TRF=1 (just predicted), outside view dominates (w_in=0.3). At TRF=0 (deadline), inside view dominates (w_in=1.0). The blend regularizes overconfident inside views toward the historical base rate.
Probability over time
Milestone chain
- 2026-06-01 → 2027-06-30pendingFrontier model scores top-tier on automated AI R&D benchmark (METR/RE-Bench)How: Frontier LLM achieves human-expert parity (≥80%) on METR RE-Bench or equivalent automated AI research benchmarkSource: METR (Model Evaluation and Threat Research), Anthropic/OpenAI evalsconf 65%Notes: Pre-AGI signal — model needs to do AI research before automating it.
- 2026-09-01 → 2027-12-31pendingMajor lab claims '≥30% of internal AI research time saved by AI agents'How: OpenAI, Anthropic, DeepMind, or xAI publicly claims ≥30% of researcher-hours augmented or replaced by AI agents in internal R&DSource: Lab blog posts, earnings calls, conference talksconf 70%Notes: Aschenbrenner's RSI thesis — labs already report meaningful R&D acceleration.
- 2027-07-01pendingQ1 window check-in (25%)
- 2027-12-29pendingQ2 window check-in (50%)
- 2027-01-01 → 2028-12-31pendingAlgorithmic-progress effective-compute doubling time falls below 6 monthsHow: Epoch AI / equivalent measures effective-compute doubling time below 6 months (vs ~6-12 months baseline) attributable to algorithmic gainsSource: https://aiprospects.substack.com/p/the-reality-of-recursive-improvement, Epoch AIconf 45%
- 2027-01-01 → 2028-12-31pendingAGI declaration by ≥1 frontier labHow: OpenAI, Anthropic, DeepMind, or comparable lab publicly declares AGI achieved (any reasonable definition: human-level on broad tasks)Source: Lab announcements, capability evaluationsconf 30%Notes: Pre-condition for the claim — '10 years compressed into 1 year' requires AGI first.
- 2028-06-27pendingQ3 window check-in (75%)
- 2027-06-01 → 2029-10-31pendingAlgorithmic capability jump equivalent to GPT-2 → GPT-4 in <12 monthsHow: Per Epoch/Stanford HAI 2028+ AI Index, capability gains equivalent to a GPT-2 → GPT-4 OOM jump occur in <12 months (vs historical ~4 years)Source: Stanford HAI AI Index 2028/2029, Epoch AI capability trackingconf 20%Notes: Cascade — direct realization of 'decade compressed into 1 year' claim. Aschenbrenner's specific 4-OOM-in-1yr scenario.
No downstream cascades — this prediction is a leaf in the dependency graph.
What if this resolves?
Click a button to clamp this prediction and run a Gibbs sample. Returns the predictions whose marginals shift most. ~30s per run; ideal for stress-testing "if X resolves, what else moves?"
Evidence chain
Network propagation neighbors
Top incoming (parents)
Edges that influence THIS node's belief
Top outgoing (children)
Predictions THIS node influences
No outgoing edges.
Prerequisites (6)
| Type | Pred | Title | Domain | Lag |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| correlate | S_ASI_SLOW_2040PLUS | ASI slow: post-2040 / soft takeoff | asi_recursive_self_improvement | — |
| correlate | S_AGI_MID_2029 | AGI mid: Kurzweil 2029 path | agi_general_capability | — |
| correlate | S_AGI_SLOW_2031 | AGI slow: Schmidt/Hassabis 5-10 year path | agi_general_capability | — |
| correlate | S_AGI_WINTER_2036PLUS | AGI delayed: capability plateau or AI winter | agi_general_capability | — |
| killer | TK01 | AGI Capability Plateau (2026-27 Training Stall) | — | — |
| killer | TK03 | AI Regulatory Moratorium (EU/US Capability Freeze) | — | — |
Dependents (0)
| Type | Pred | Title | Domain | Lag |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No dependents | ||||
Linked documents (2)
| Sim | Source | Title | Market prob | Polarity | Reviewed | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.720 | manifold | Will ASI be achieved less than a year after continual learning? | 31% | mentions | pending | 2026-05-28 |
| 0.634 | arxiv | Validation of an AI-based end-to-end model for prostate pathology using long-term archived routine samples | — | mentions | pending | 2026-05-04 |
Raw metadata
{
"nia": false,
"qty": "decade compressed to <1yr",
"mode": "PROPHECY",
"role": "Cited-Researcher",
"caveats": "Requires AGI to be achievable in the first place; requires alignment to not block scaling.",
"context": "Core 'Intelligence Explosion' thesis: hundreds of millions of instantiated AGIs working 24/7 on neural-architecture optimization at electronic speeds.",
"to_year": 2029,
"conv_cues": "recursive self-improvement; explicit compression",
"direction": "NUMERIC_TARGET",
"from_year": 2027,
"timeframe": "post-2027",
"conv_level": "HIGH",
"milestones": [
{
"kind": "llm_pre_event",
"label": "Frontier model scores top-tier on automated AI R&D benchmark (METR/RE-Bench)",
"notes": "Pre-AGI signal — model needs to do AI research before automating it.",
"source": "METR (Model Evaluation and Threat Research), Anthropic/OpenAI evals",
"status": "pending",
"weight": 0.4,
"ordinal": -8,
"source_id": null,
"confidence": 0.65,
"expected_date": "2026-12-15",
"research_origin": "deep_research",
"expected_date_range": {
"to": "2027-06-30",
"from": "2026-06-01"
},
"measurement_criterion": "Frontier LLM achieves human-expert parity (≥80%) on METR RE-Bench or equivalent automated AI research benchmark"
},
{
"kind": "llm_pre_event",
"label": "Major lab claims '≥30% of internal AI research time saved by AI agents'",
"notes": "Aschenbrenner's RSI thesis — labs already report meaningful R&D acceleration.",
"source": "Lab blog posts, earnings calls, conference talks",
"status": "pending",
"weight": 0.4,
"ordinal": -7,
"source_id": null,
"confidence": 0.7,
"expected_date": "2027-05-02",
"research_origin": "deep_research",
"expected_date_range": {
"to": "2027-12-31",
"from": "2026-09-01"
},
"measurement_criterion": "OpenAI, Anthropic, DeepMind, or xAI publicly claims ≥30% of researcher-hours augmented or replaced by AI agents in internal R&D"
},
{
"kind": "quartile_checkpoint",
"label": "Q1 window check-in (25%)",
"status": "pending",
"weight": 0.05,
"ordinal": -6,
"source_id": null,
"expected_date": "2027-07-01",
"observed_date": null
},
{
"kind": "quartile_checkpoint",
"label": "Q2 window check-in (50%)",
"status": "pending",
"weight": 0.05,
"ordinal": -5,
"source_id": null,
"expected_date": "2027-12-29",
"observed_date": null
},
{
"kind": "llm_pre_event",
"label": "Algorithmic-progress effective-compute doubling time falls below 6 months",
"source": "https://aiprospects.substack.com/p/the-reality-of-recursive-improvement, Epoch AI",
"status": "pending",
"weight": 0.4,
"ordinal": -4,
"source_id": null,
"confidence": 0.45,
"source_url": "https://aiprospects.substack.com/p/the-reality-of-recursive-improvement",
"expected_date": "2028-01-01",
"research_origin": "deep_research",
"expected_date_range": {
"to": "2028-12-31",
"from": "2027-01-01"
},
"measurement_criterion": "Epoch AI / equivalent measures effective-compute doubling time below 6 months (vs ~6-12 months baseline) attributable to algorithmic gains"
},
{
"kind": "llm_pre_event",
"label": "AGI declaration by ≥1 frontier lab",
"notes": "Pre-condition for the claim — '10 years compressed into 1 year' requires AGI first.",
"source": "Lab announcements, capability evaluations",
"status": "pending",
"weight": 0.4,
"ordinal": -3,
"source_id": null,
"confidence": 0.3,
"expected_date": "2028-01-01",
"research_origin": "training",
"expected_date_range": {
"to": "2028-12-31",
"from": "2027-01-01"
},
"measurement_criterion": "OpenAI, Anthropic,
... (truncated)