← Cockpit
CMQ_016predictionAIintelligence-explosion

Post-AGI (2027+), a decade of human-led algorithmic progress will be compressed into ~1 year or less as AGIs automate AI research.

Predictor: Leopold Aschenbrenner

Prior probability
30.0%
Current probability
33.1%
evolves via intake + LBP
Conviction
5/5
Signal quality
A
Resolution
pending
Window
2027-01-01 – 2029-10-31
Edges in / out
6 / 0
Tickers exposed
0

Prediction text

Post-AGI (2027+), a decade of human-led algorithmic progress will be compressed into ~1 year or less as AGIs automate AI research. | Post-AGI capability jump rate

Key catalyst: Post-AGI capability jump rate

Watch events: AI-automated ML research outputs; published-paper authorship tracking; frontier model capability jump rates.

Resolution evidence

Status: pending

Recursive self-improvement (Wissner-Gross SEM-adj call: 'already here, not 10 years out') showing early signs via AlphaEvolve; magnitude uncertain.

Predictor: Leopold Aschenbrenner

κ + Brier as of 2026-05-22
κ (discount)
0.688
Brier
0.0417
excellent
Hits / Misses
2 / 0
of 3 resolved
Hit rate
66.7%
Calibration plot (stated vs observed)

Evidence about this node from Leopold Aschenbrenner is multiplied by κ in /api/intake. Lower κ = less weight; floors at 0.10 (effectively silenced) and caps at 1.00 (full weight).

Reference class: agi_breakthrough_5y

Linked via embedding similarity 0.680

Major capability discontinuity (e.g. AGI by named target year, 5-year horizon)

Base rate
20.0%
1/5 historical
Inside weight
Outside weight
no pull
inside 33.1% → blend 33.1% 0.0pp)

Tetlock-style outside view: at TRF=1 (just predicted), outside view dominates (w_in=0.3). At TRF=0 (deadline), inside view dominates (w_in=1.0). The blend regularizes overconfident inside views toward the historical base rate.

Probability over time

7 prob_history rows
0%25%50%75%100%prior 30%2026-04-302026-04-302026-05-17
intake v2milestone miss sweeplbp propagationreference class assignedlegacy v1prior_prob (analyst seed)current = 33.1%

Milestone chain

Pre-event signals (upstream prereqs + window checkpoints) → resolution event → downstream cascades. Status/dates update from linked nodes; re-derive nightly via scripts/ops/derive_milestones.py.
Leading chain: 8 pending
  1. 2026-06-01 → 2027-06-30pendingFrontier model scores top-tier on automated AI R&D benchmark (METR/RE-Bench)
    How: Frontier LLM achieves human-expert parity (≥80%) on METR RE-Bench or equivalent automated AI research benchmark
    Source: METR (Model Evaluation and Threat Research), Anthropic/OpenAI evalsconf 65%
    Notes: Pre-AGI signal — model needs to do AI research before automating it.
  2. 2026-09-01 → 2027-12-31pendingMajor lab claims '≥30% of internal AI research time saved by AI agents'
    How: OpenAI, Anthropic, DeepMind, or xAI publicly claims ≥30% of researcher-hours augmented or replaced by AI agents in internal R&D
    Source: Lab blog posts, earnings calls, conference talksconf 70%
    Notes: Aschenbrenner's RSI thesis — labs already report meaningful R&D acceleration.
  3. 2027-07-01pendingQ1 window check-in (25%)
  4. 2027-12-29pendingQ2 window check-in (50%)
  5. 2027-01-01 → 2028-12-31pendingAlgorithmic-progress effective-compute doubling time falls below 6 months
    How: Epoch AI / equivalent measures effective-compute doubling time below 6 months (vs ~6-12 months baseline) attributable to algorithmic gains
    Source: https://aiprospects.substack.com/p/the-reality-of-recursive-improvement, Epoch AIconf 45%
  6. 2027-01-01 → 2028-12-31pendingAGI declaration by ≥1 frontier lab
    How: OpenAI, Anthropic, DeepMind, or comparable lab publicly declares AGI achieved (any reasonable definition: human-level on broad tasks)
    Source: Lab announcements, capability evaluationsconf 30%
    Notes: Pre-condition for the claim — '10 years compressed into 1 year' requires AGI first.
  7. 2028-06-27pendingQ3 window check-in (75%)
  8. 2027-06-01 → 2029-10-31pendingAlgorithmic capability jump equivalent to GPT-2 → GPT-4 in <12 months
    How: Per Epoch/Stanford HAI 2028+ AI Index, capability gains equivalent to a GPT-2 → GPT-4 OOM jump occur in <12 months (vs historical ~4 years)
    Source: Stanford HAI AI Index 2028/2029, Epoch AI capability trackingconf 20%
    Notes: Cascade — direct realization of 'decade compressed into 1 year' claim. Aschenbrenner's specific 4-OOM-in-1yr scenario.

No downstream cascades — this prediction is a leaf in the dependency graph.

What if this resolves?

Clamp this prediction TRUE or FALSE and run a counterfactual Gibbs sample. Surfaces the predictions whose marginals shift most under that assumption.
(live posterior: 33%)

Click a button to clamp this prediction and run a Gibbs sample. Returns the predictions whose marginals shift most. ~30s per run; ideal for stress-testing "if X resolves, what else moves?"

Evidence chain

Every probability update with full Bayesian provenance — chronological, latest first
LBP2026-05-17T02:00:01Z33.1%+1.3pp
Network propagation: 31.8% → 33.1%
5-iter LBP, residual 0.00689 · damping 0.5, w_intrinsic 0.5 · method lbp_v3 · run e607fa96
LBP2026-05-10T02:00:02Z31.8%+2.5pp
Network propagation: 29.3% → 31.8%
6-iter LBP, residual 0.00584 · damping 0.5, w_intrinsic 0.5 · method lbp_v3 · run e5c18d29
LBP2026-05-03T02:00:01Z29.3%+4.6pp
Network propagation: 24.7% → 29.3%
6-iter LBP, residual 0.00677 · damping 0.5, w_intrinsic 0.5 · method lbp_v3 · run 1a683ac9
LBP2026-04-30T16:39:51Z24.7%+2.0pp
Network propagation: 22.7% → 24.7%
5-iter LBP, residual 0.00825 · damping 0.5, w_intrinsic 0.5 · method lbp_v2 · run 0c8a4ea3
legacy v12026-04-30T16:13:50Z22.7%-2.0pp
reference_class_assigned bayesian_v2 inside=0.300 blend=0.227 w_in=0.30 agi_breakthrough_5y
LBP2026-04-30T02:18:57Z24.7%+2.0pp
Network propagation: 22.7% → 24.7%
5-iter LBP, residual 0.00825 · damping 0.5, w_intrinsic 0.5 · method lbp_v1 · run 592311ef
legacy v12026-04-30T01:56:50Z22.7%-7.3pp
reference_class_assigned bayesian_v2 inside=0.300 blend=0.227 w_in=0.30 agi_breakthrough_5y

Network propagation neighbors

Top edges sorted by latest LBP cross-impact
All propagation →

Top incoming (parents)

Edges that influence THIS node's belief

KindNodeTheir probP(c|s=T)P(c|s=F)Δ implied
killerTK01
AGI Capability Plateau (2026-27 Training Stall)
15.0%0.0500.300-0.069
killerTK03
AI Regulatory Moratorium (EU/US Capability Freeze)
10.0%0.0500.300-0.057

Top outgoing (children)

Predictions THIS node influences

No outgoing edges.

Prerequisites (6)

Predictions that must hit first
TypePredTitleDomainLag
correlateS_ASI_SLOW_2040PLUSASI slow: post-2040 / soft takeoffasi_recursive_self_improvement
correlateS_AGI_MID_2029AGI mid: Kurzweil 2029 pathagi_general_capability
correlateS_AGI_SLOW_2031AGI slow: Schmidt/Hassabis 5-10 year pathagi_general_capability
correlateS_AGI_WINTER_2036PLUSAGI delayed: capability plateau or AI winteragi_general_capability
killerTK01AGI Capability Plateau (2026-27 Training Stall)
killerTK03AI Regulatory Moratorium (EU/US Capability Freeze)

Dependents (0)

Predictions enabled by this
TypePredTitleDomainLag
No dependents

Linked documents (2)

Auto-generated by cosine similarity from Polymarket / Manifold / EDGAR / GDELT
SimSourceTitleMarket probPolarityReviewedPublished
0.720manifoldWill ASI be achieved less than a year after continual learning?31%mentionspending2026-05-28
0.634arxivValidation of an AI-based end-to-end model for prostate pathology using long-term archived routine samplesmentionspending2026-05-04

Raw metadata

From Thesis_Timeline_v1.0_FINAL workbook
{
  "nia": false,
  "qty": "decade compressed to <1yr",
  "mode": "PROPHECY",
  "role": "Cited-Researcher",
  "caveats": "Requires AGI to be achievable in the first place; requires alignment to not block scaling.",
  "context": "Core 'Intelligence Explosion' thesis: hundreds of millions of instantiated AGIs working 24/7 on neural-architecture optimization at electronic speeds.",
  "to_year": 2029,
  "conv_cues": "recursive self-improvement; explicit compression",
  "direction": "NUMERIC_TARGET",
  "from_year": 2027,
  "timeframe": "post-2027",
  "conv_level": "HIGH",
  "milestones": [
    {
      "kind": "llm_pre_event",
      "label": "Frontier model scores top-tier on automated AI R&D benchmark (METR/RE-Bench)",
      "notes": "Pre-AGI signal — model needs to do AI research before automating it.",
      "source": "METR (Model Evaluation and Threat Research), Anthropic/OpenAI evals",
      "status": "pending",
      "weight": 0.4,
      "ordinal": -8,
      "source_id": null,
      "confidence": 0.65,
      "expected_date": "2026-12-15",
      "research_origin": "deep_research",
      "expected_date_range": {
        "to": "2027-06-30",
        "from": "2026-06-01"
      },
      "measurement_criterion": "Frontier LLM achieves human-expert parity (≥80%) on METR RE-Bench or equivalent automated AI research benchmark"
    },
    {
      "kind": "llm_pre_event",
      "label": "Major lab claims '≥30% of internal AI research time saved by AI agents'",
      "notes": "Aschenbrenner's RSI thesis — labs already report meaningful R&D acceleration.",
      "source": "Lab blog posts, earnings calls, conference talks",
      "status": "pending",
      "weight": 0.4,
      "ordinal": -7,
      "source_id": null,
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "expected_date": "2027-05-02",
      "research_origin": "deep_research",
      "expected_date_range": {
        "to": "2027-12-31",
        "from": "2026-09-01"
      },
      "measurement_criterion": "OpenAI, Anthropic, DeepMind, or xAI publicly claims ≥30% of researcher-hours augmented or replaced by AI agents in internal R&D"
    },
    {
      "kind": "quartile_checkpoint",
      "label": "Q1 window check-in (25%)",
      "status": "pending",
      "weight": 0.05,
      "ordinal": -6,
      "source_id": null,
      "expected_date": "2027-07-01",
      "observed_date": null
    },
    {
      "kind": "quartile_checkpoint",
      "label": "Q2 window check-in (50%)",
      "status": "pending",
      "weight": 0.05,
      "ordinal": -5,
      "source_id": null,
      "expected_date": "2027-12-29",
      "observed_date": null
    },
    {
      "kind": "llm_pre_event",
      "label": "Algorithmic-progress effective-compute doubling time falls below 6 months",
      "source": "https://aiprospects.substack.com/p/the-reality-of-recursive-improvement, Epoch AI",
      "status": "pending",
      "weight": 0.4,
      "ordinal": -4,
      "source_id": null,
      "confidence": 0.45,
      "source_url": "https://aiprospects.substack.com/p/the-reality-of-recursive-improvement",
      "expected_date": "2028-01-01",
      "research_origin": "deep_research",
      "expected_date_range": {
        "to": "2028-12-31",
        "from": "2027-01-01"
      },
      "measurement_criterion": "Epoch AI / equivalent measures effective-compute doubling time below 6 months (vs ~6-12 months baseline) attributable to algorithmic gains"
    },
    {
      "kind": "llm_pre_event",
      "label": "AGI declaration by ≥1 frontier lab",
      "notes": "Pre-condition for the claim — '10 years compressed into 1 year' requires AGI first.",
      "source": "Lab announcements, capability evaluations",
      "status": "pending",
      "weight": 0.4,
      "ordinal": -3,
      "source_id": null,
      "confidence": 0.3,
      "expected_date": "2028-01-01",
      "research_origin": "training",
      "expected_date_range": {
        "to": "2028-12-31",
        "from": "2027-01-01"
      },
      "measurement_criterion": "OpenAI, Anthropic, 
... (truncated)