← Cockpit
SEM_017predictionSemishardware

TSMC will produce over 10M wafers/month total in 2026, including ~100K/mo at 2nm and ~200K/mo at 3nm.

Predictor: TSMC (All-In Podcast analysis)

Prior probability
80.0%
Current probability
64.8%
evolves via intake + LBP
Conviction
4/5
Signal quality
B
Resolution
in_progress
Window
2026-01-01 – 2026-12-31
Edges in / out
3 / 5
Tickers exposed
32

Prediction text

TSMC will produce over 10M wafers/month total in 2026, including ~100K/mo at 2nm and ~200K/mo at 3nm. | TSMC 2nm N2 mass-production ramp H2-2026

Key catalyst: TSMC 2nm N2 mass-production ramp H2-2026

Watch events: TSMC quarterly wafer-output disclosures; 2nm yield announcements

Resolution evidence

Status: in_progress

TSMC guided 3nm ramp to 130K wpm by end-2026; 2nm N2 mass production targeted H2-2026 at Fab 20 (Baoshan). Total wafer output across all nodes consistent with 10M/mo+ estimate.

Predictor: TSMC (All-In Podcast analysis)

κ + Brier as of 2026-05-22
κ (discount)
0.500
Brier
Hits / Misses
0 / 0
Hit rate

Evidence about this node from TSMC (All-In Podcast analysis) is multiplied by κ in /api/intake. Lower κ = less weight; floors at 0.10 (effectively silenced) and caps at 1.00 (full weight).

Reference class: fab_construction_3y

Linked via embedding similarity 0.600

Greenfield semiconductor fab construction within 3 years of announce

Base rate
58.0%
7/12 historical
Inside weight
Outside weight
no pull
inside 64.8% → blend 64.8% 0.0pp)

Tetlock-style outside view: at TRF=1 (just predicted), outside view dominates (w_in=0.3). At TRF=0 (deadline), inside view dominates (w_in=1.0). The blend regularizes overconfident inside views toward the historical base rate.

Probability over time

7 prob_history rows
0%25%50%75%100%prior 80%2026-04-302026-04-302026-05-10
intake v2milestone miss sweeplbp propagationreference class assignedlegacy v1prior_prob (analyst seed)current = 64.8%

Milestone chain

Pre-event signals (upstream prereqs + window checkpoints) → resolution event → downstream cascades. Status/dates update from linked nodes; re-derive nightly via scripts/ops/derive_milestones.py.
Leading chain: 3 fired ✓ · 2 overdue ⏱ · 2 pending
  1. 2026-01-31hitTSMC 3nm baseline at end-2025: 120K-130K wafers/month
    How: Industry data confirms TSMC end-2025 3nm capacity at 120-130K wafers/month
    Source: https://www.trendforce.com/news/2026/04/27/news-tsmc-3nm-monthly-capacity-may-hit-180k-wafers-by-2026-up-over-40-yoy-on-ai-demand/ — 3nm baselineconf 92%
  2. 2026-02-24overdueQ1 window check-in (25%)
  3. 2026-02-28hitTSMC 2nm baseline at end-2025: 30K-40K wafers/month
    How: Industry data confirms TSMC end-2025 2nm wafer input at 30-40K/month, ramping
    Source: https://www.trendforce.com/news/2025/08/05/news-tsmcs-2nm-node-reportedly-set-for-60k-monthly-output-in-2026-with-prices-50-above-3nm/ — 2nm baselineconf 92%
  4. 2026-04-20overdueQ2 window check-in (50%)
  5. 2026-04-27hitTSMC 3nm output target raised to 180K wafers/month by EOY 2026
    How: TSMC publicly confirms 3nm monthly capacity target raised from 150K to ~180K wafers by end-2026 (+40% YoY)
    Source: https://www.trendforce.com/news/2026/04/27/news-tsmc-3nm-monthly-capacity-may-hit-180k-wafers-by-2026-up-over-40-yoy-on-ai-demand/ — TSMC 3nm 180Kconf 95%
    Notes: 180K vs SEM_017 thesis of 200K — close but slightly under thesis.
  6. 2026-06-13pendingQ3 window check-in (75%)
  7. 2026-06-30pendingTSMC 2nm priced 50% above 3nm
    How: TSMC 2nm wafer ASP confirmed at >=50% premium over 3nm
    Source: https://www.trendforce.com/news/2025/08/05/news-tsmcs-2nm-node-reportedly-set-for-60k-monthly-output-in-2026-with-prices-50-above-3nm/ — 2nm 50% premiumconf 85%
  8. 2026-12-31pendingTSMC 2nm reaches ~100K wafers/month by end-2026 (matches thesis)
    How: TSMC 2nm monthly capacity ramps to >=100K wafers/month by end-2026 — direct confirmation of SEM_017 thesis
    Source: https://wccftech.com/tsmc-two-2nm-plants-sold-out-for-2026/ — TSMC 2nm 100Kconf 85%
  9. 2027-01-01 → 2027-12-31pendingCascade: TSMC 2nm output exceeds 3nm by 2x by 2027
    How: TSMC 2nm output reaches >=2x of 3nm output (5 fabs ramping) per WCCFTech roadmap
    Source: https://wccftech.com/tsmc-doubles-down-on-2nm-five-fabs-ramping-at-once-output-eclipse-3nm-by-2x/ — 2nm 2x by 2027conf 55%

What if this resolves?

Clamp this prediction TRUE or FALSE and run a counterfactual Gibbs sample. Surfaces the predictions whose marginals shift most under that assumption.
(live posterior: 65%)

Click a button to clamp this prediction and run a Gibbs sample. Returns the predictions whose marginals shift most. ~30s per run; ideal for stress-testing "if X resolves, what else moves?"

Evidence chain

Every probability update with full Bayesian provenance — chronological, latest first
LBP2026-05-10T02:00:02Z64.8%+2.0pp
Network propagation: 62.8% → 64.8%
6-iter LBP, residual 0.00584 · damping 0.5, w_intrinsic 0.5 · method lbp_v3 · run e5c18d29
LBP2026-05-03T02:00:01Z62.8%+4.0pp
Network propagation: 58.9% → 62.8%
6-iter LBP, residual 0.00677 · damping 0.5, w_intrinsic 0.5 · method lbp_v3 · run 1a683ac9
metadata_milestone_miss_sweep2026-05-02T22:07:21Z58.9%-10.0pp
metadata_milestone_miss_sweep bayesian_v2 n=2 inside=0.596 blend=0.589 LLR=-0.405 κ=0.50 w_in=0.53 fab_construction_3y
Raw metadata
{
  "trf": 0.6650500679109432,
  "kappa": 0.5,
  "base_rate": 0.58,
  "predictor": "TSMC (All-In Podcast analysis)",
  "total_llr": -0.8109302162163288,
  "grace_days": 7,
  "bayesian_v2": true,
  "prior_logit": 0.7948699001173678,
  "bayes_factor": "1.5:1 against",
  "blend_reason": "blend 53% inside / 46% outside (TRF=0.665, base_rate=0.580 from fab_construction_3y)",
  "inside_prior": 0.6888760348950811,
  "kappa_source": "predictor_table",
  "n_milestones": 2,
  "blend_applied": true,
  "contributions": [
    {
      "llr": -0.4054651081081644,
      "kind": "quartile_checkpoint",
      "kappa": 0.5,
      "label": "Q1 window check-in (25%)",
      "weight": 0.05,
      "strength": "weak",
      "confidence": null,
      "source_url": null,
      "adjusted_llr": -0.2027325540540822,
      "expected_date": "2026-02-24",
      "measurement_criterion": null
    },
    {
      "llr": -0.4054651081081644,
      "kind": "quartile_checkpoint",
      "kappa": 0.5,
      "label": "Q2 window check-in (50%)",
      "weight": 0.05,
      "strength": "weak",
      "confidence": null,
      "source_url": null,
      "adjusted_llr": -0.2027325540540822,
      "expected_date": "2026-04-20",
      "measurement_criterion": null
    }
  ],
  "evidence_kind": "metadata_milestone_miss_sweep",
  "inside_source": "history_v2",
  "inside_weight": 0.5344649524623397,
  "outside_weight": 0.4655350475376603,
  "posterior_prob": 0.5886495627538888,
  "posterior_logit": 0.3894047920092034,
  "predictor_brier": null,
  "inside_posterior": 0.5961394068827527,
  "blended_posterior": 0.5886495627538888,
  "reference_class_id": "fab_construction_3y",
  "total_adjusted_llr": -0.4054651081081644,
  "predictor_n_resolved": 0
}
LBP2026-04-30T16:39:51Z68.9%-1.9pp
Network propagation: 70.8% → 68.9%
5-iter LBP, residual 0.00825 · damping 0.5, w_intrinsic 0.5 · method lbp_v2 · run 0c8a4ea3
legacy v12026-04-30T16:13:50Z70.8%+1.9pp
reference_class_assigned bayesian_v2 inside=0.800 blend=0.708 w_in=0.53 fab_construction_3y
LBP2026-04-30T02:18:57Z68.9%-1.9pp
Network propagation: 70.8% → 68.9%
5-iter LBP, residual 0.00825 · damping 0.5, w_intrinsic 0.5 · method lbp_v1 · run 592311ef
legacy v12026-04-30T01:56:50Z70.8%-9.2pp
reference_class_assigned bayesian_v2 inside=0.800 blend=0.708 w_in=0.53 fab_construction_3y

Network propagation neighbors

Top edges sorted by latest LBP cross-impact
All propagation →

Top incoming (parents)

Edges that influence THIS node's belief

KindNodeTheir probP(c|s=T)P(c|s=F)Δ implied
killerTK09
Energy Grid Cap (Data Center Power Wall)
35.0%0.0500.800-0.110
killerTK06
China-Taiwan Military Conflict
8.0%0.0500.800+0.092
killerTK02
AI Compute Supply Shock (TSMC/Taiwan Disruption)
12.0%0.0500.800+0.062

Top outgoing (children)

Predictions THIS node influences

KindNodeTheir probP(c|s=T)P(c|s=F)Δ implied
prereq242_031
Most large companies' business models will be disrupted in 2Peter Diamandis
36.1%0.6500.050+0.083
prereq247_023
AI will be able to do everything a white collar worker does Dave Blundin
40.8%0.7200.050+0.083
prereq247_055
Acquisition of small specialized AI teams for hundreds of miDave Blundin
49.9%0.6500.050-0.055
prereq248_033
Superhuman AI will make BCI-enhanced humans irrelevant compaDave Blundin
36.7%0.6000.050+0.044
prereq230_006
The frontier models will go dark — kept internal to benefit Peter Diamandis
48.0%0.6500.050-0.036

Ticker exposure

32 ticker(s) linked

Beneficiaries (24)

ALABAMBAARMASMLCEVACRWVIRENMUNBISNVDASITMTSMAMDNXPIANETMRVLCSCODELLAVGOSIEGYLNVGYAMATQCOMATEYY

Adverse (4)

AMATINTCLRCXAMD

Prerequisites (3)

Predictions that must hit first
TypePredTitleDomainLag
killerTK09Energy Grid Cap (Data Center Power Wall)
killerTK02AI Compute Supply Shock (TSMC/Taiwan Disruption)
killerTK06China-Taiwan Military Conflict

Dependents (5)

Predictions enabled by this
TypePredTitleDomainLag
prereq247_023AI will be able to do everything a white collar worker does imminentlyAI
prereq242_031Most large companies' business models will be disrupted in 2-5 yearsMarkets/Stocks
prereq230_006The frontier models will go dark — kept internal to benefit the labs in an all-out battle.AI
prereq247_055Acquisition of small specialized AI teams for hundreds of millions will become commonAI
prereq248_033Superhuman AI will make BCI-enhanced humans irrelevant compared to AI 2 years from today.AI

Linked documents (3)

Auto-generated by cosine similarity from Polymarket / Manifold / EDGAR / GDELT
SimSourceTitleMarket probPolarityReviewedPublished
0.655manifoldWhat will be the sum of 2026 USAMO MOHSmentionspending2026-04-24
0.626manifoldWill the June 2026 ISM Manufacturing PMI be at least 50.0?64%mentionspending2026-06-02
0.567edgar_8kMOSAIC CO (MOS) (CIK 0001285785)mentionspending2026-05-29

Raw metadata

From Thesis_Timeline_v1.0_FINAL workbook
{
  "nia": false,
  "qty": ">10M wafers/mo",
  "mode": "FORECAST",
  "role": "Cited-Analyst",
  "context": "TSMC global capacity projection 2026: >10M wafers/mo across all nodes, dominated by 3nm (200K) and 2nm (100K) at leading edge.",
  "to_year": 2026,
  "conv_cues": "expected to produce; analyst consensus",
  "direction": "NUMERIC_TARGET",
  "from_year": 2026,
  "timeframe": "2026",
  "conv_level": "HIGH",
  "milestones": [
    {
      "kind": "llm_pre_event",
      "label": "TSMC 3nm baseline at end-2025: 120K-130K wafers/month",
      "source": "https://www.trendforce.com/news/2026/04/27/news-tsmc-3nm-monthly-capacity-may-hit-180k-wafers-by-2026-up-over-40-yoy-on-ai-demand/ — 3nm baseline",
      "status": "hit",
      "weight": 0.4,
      "ordinal": -7,
      "source_id": null,
      "confidence": 0.92,
      "source_url": "https://www.trendforce.com/news/2026/04/27/news-tsmc-3nm-monthly-capacity-may-hit-180k-wafers-by-2026-up-over-40-yoy-on-ai-demand/",
      "expected_date": "2026-01-31",
      "observed_date": "2026-01-31",
      "research_origin": "deep_research",
      "measurement_criterion": "Industry data confirms TSMC end-2025 3nm capacity at 120-130K wafers/month"
    },
    {
      "kind": "quartile_checkpoint",
      "label": "Q1 window check-in (25%)",
      "status": "overdue",
      "weight": 0.05,
      "ordinal": -6,
      "source_id": null,
      "expected_date": "2026-02-24",
      "observed_date": null,
      "miss_emitted_at": "2026-05-02T22:07:21.384228+00:00",
      "miss_emitted_by": "metadata_milestone_sweep"
    },
    {
      "kind": "llm_pre_event",
      "label": "TSMC 2nm baseline at end-2025: 30K-40K wafers/month",
      "source": "https://www.trendforce.com/news/2025/08/05/news-tsmcs-2nm-node-reportedly-set-for-60k-monthly-output-in-2026-with-prices-50-above-3nm/ — 2nm baseline",
      "status": "hit",
      "weight": 0.4,
      "ordinal": -5,
      "source_id": null,
      "confidence": 0.92,
      "source_url": "https://www.trendforce.com/news/2025/08/05/news-tsmcs-2nm-node-reportedly-set-for-60k-monthly-output-in-2026-with-prices-50-above-3nm/",
      "expected_date": "2026-02-28",
      "observed_date": "2026-02-28",
      "research_origin": "deep_research",
      "measurement_criterion": "Industry data confirms TSMC end-2025 2nm wafer input at 30-40K/month, ramping"
    },
    {
      "kind": "quartile_checkpoint",
      "label": "Q2 window check-in (50%)",
      "status": "overdue",
      "weight": 0.05,
      "ordinal": -4,
      "source_id": null,
      "expected_date": "2026-04-20",
      "observed_date": null,
      "miss_emitted_at": "2026-05-02T22:07:21.384228+00:00",
      "miss_emitted_by": "metadata_milestone_sweep"
    },
    {
      "kind": "llm_pre_event",
      "label": "TSMC 3nm output target raised to 180K wafers/month by EOY 2026",
      "notes": "180K vs SEM_017 thesis of 200K — close but slightly under thesis.",
      "source": "https://www.trendforce.com/news/2026/04/27/news-tsmc-3nm-monthly-capacity-may-hit-180k-wafers-by-2026-up-over-40-yoy-on-ai-demand/ — TSMC 3nm 180K",
      "status": "hit",
      "weight": 0.4,
      "ordinal": -3,
      "source_id": null,
      "confidence": 0.95,
      "source_url": "https://www.trendforce.com/news/2026/04/27/news-tsmc-3nm-monthly-capacity-may-hit-180k-wafers-by-2026-up-over-40-yoy-on-ai-demand/",
      "expected_date": "2026-04-27",
      "observed_date": "2026-04-27",
      "research_origin": "deep_research",
      "measurement_criterion": "TSMC publicly confirms 3nm monthly capacity target raised from 150K to ~180K wafers by end-2026 (+40% YoY)"
    },
    {
      "kind": "quartile_checkpoint",
      "label": "Q3 window check-in (75%)",
      "status": "pending",
      "weight": 0.05,
      "ordinal": -2,
      "source_id": null,
      "expected_date": "2026-06-13",
      "observed_date": null
    },
    {
      "kind": "llm_pre_event",
      "label": "TSMC 2nm priced 50% above 3nm",
      "source": "https://www.trendfo
... (truncated)