Compound Fork — AGI × $1T+ IPO
Each cell = a joint scenario "Both branches fire". Cell intensity = total |Δ| across the 200 highest-conviction tradeable predictions vs their unconditional posterior. Joint probabilities approximated via log-odds combination (assumes conditional independence given the prediction — coarse but bounded). Click a cell to drill into the dominant single-fork view.
Pick two fork families
| AGI ↓ × $1T+ IPO → | IPO_TRILLION_2026 prior 25% | IPO_TRILLION_2027 prior 40% | IPO_TRILLION_2028 prior 25% | IPO_TRILLION_NONE_5Y prior 10% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AGI_FAST_2027 prior 30% | 123 claims · Σ|Δ| 16.26 | 123 claims · Σ|Δ| 16.36 | 123 claims · Σ|Δ| 16.42 | 123 claims · Σ|Δ| 16.53 |
AGI_MID_2029 prior 35% | 121 claims · Σ|Δ| 15.87 | 121 claims · Σ|Δ| 15.97 | 121 claims · Σ|Δ| 16.03 | 121 claims · Σ|Δ| 16.14 |
AGI_SLOW_2031 prior 25% | 127 claims · Σ|Δ| 16.78 | 127 claims · Σ|Δ| 16.88 | 127 claims · Σ|Δ| 16.94 | 127 claims · Σ|Δ| 17.05 |
AGI_WINTER_2036PLUS prior 10% | 125 claims · Σ|Δ| 16.59 | 125 claims · Σ|Δ| 16.70 | 125 claims · Σ|Δ| 16.76 | 125 claims · Σ|Δ| 16.86 |
Method note
Joint conditional probability is approximated via log-odds combination: logit(P(pred|A,B)) ≈ logit(P(pred|A)) + logit(P(pred|B)) − logit(P(pred)). This is the closed-form Bayesian update assuming A and B are conditionally independent given the prediction. It's correct when the two scenarios act on the prediction through different causal paths; it's pessimistic when they overlap. The exact joint requires running the Gibbs sampler with both scenarios clamped, which would be N×M=16 sampling runs (~12 minutes per refresh) instead of N+M=8 — a 2× cost for higher fidelity.